Hi, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> according to #495663, roxen4 includes binaries without source (and other >> not built from source). >> Given that neither it nor its (absolute, i.e. fully broken when roxen4 >> would be removed) reverse dependencies (libroxen-form libroxen-xmlutils) >> have been in the last stable release or are terribly popular (roxen4 >> popcon is 15 installs), I wonder whether the default option should be >> removal from testing if this isn't fixed in a timely manner.
> Aren't you missing some reverse-deps here? > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache rdepends roxen4 | grep libroxen | wc -l > 83 Thanks for pointing that out. However, most of these are "| caudium", which remains available. I actually tested "dak rm -nR -s testing roxen4", so I believe that both dependencies and build-dependencies are covered. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
