Hi, > 2026年6月23日 04:02，Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> 写道： > > Hi > > On 2026-05-28 19:08:26 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2026-05-28 09:29, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>> Hi Miao, >>> >>> On Thu, 2026-05-28 at 15:09 +0800, Miao Wang wrote: >>>> I noticed that many binary packages on loong64 have a dependency to libc6 >>>> with >>>> a version constraint no lower than the latest version of glibc, which is >>>> different from other architectures, where the version constraint is derived >>>> from the actual symbol version sused in the executables. I believe that it >>>> is >>>> because of missing symbols file in libc6 for loong64. >>> >>> Good catch! >>> >>>> I have opened a merge request to glibc packaging adding the missing symbols >>>> file and the merge request has been merged and is pending for upload. I >>>> wonder >>>> what should be done to existing packages which requires a unnecessary >>>> higher >>>> version of libc6. >>> >>> That will warrant a rebuild of the affected packages. >>> >>> Let's ask Aurelien what he thinks! >> >> I do not really see what a rebuild would bring. That will indeed lower >> the dependency, but the current dependency is already satisfied in >> forky, and there is no trixie for loong64. >> >> Anyway that's a decision for the release team, putting them in the loop. > > Sorry for the delay. As this effectly does not change anything, I don't > think we need those rebuilds. >
I can see from the build logs that packages are getting expected dependencies since 2026-06-21 23:29:07 Cheers, Miao Wang
