Hi, On 2026-05-28 09:29, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Miao, > > On Thu, 2026-05-28 at 15:09 +0800, Miao Wang wrote: > > I noticed that many binary packages on loong64 have a dependency to libc6 > > with > > a version constraint no lower than the latest version of glibc, which is > > different from other architectures, where the version constraint is derived > > from the actual symbol version sused in the executables. I believe that it > > is > > because of missing symbols file in libc6 for loong64. > > Good catch! > > > I have opened a merge request to glibc packaging adding the missing symbols > > file and the merge request has been merged and is pending for upload. I > > wonder > > what should be done to existing packages which requires a unnecessary higher > > version of libc6. > > That will warrant a rebuild of the affected packages. > > Let's ask Aurelien what he thinks!
I do not really see what a rebuild would bring. That will indeed lower the dependency, but the current dependency is already satisfied in forky, and there is no trixie for loong64. Anyway that's a decision for the release team, putting them in the loop. Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://aurel32.net
