Hi On 2026-05-28 19:08:26 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, > > On 2026-05-28 09:29, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Hi Miao, > > > > On Thu, 2026-05-28 at 15:09 +0800, Miao Wang wrote: > > > I noticed that many binary packages on loong64 have a dependency to libc6 > > > with > > > a version constraint no lower than the latest version of glibc, which is > > > different from other architectures, where the version constraint is > > > derived > > > from the actual symbol version sused in the executables. I believe that > > > it is > > > because of missing symbols file in libc6 for loong64. > > > > Good catch! > > > > > I have opened a merge request to glibc packaging adding the missing > > > symbols > > > file and the merge request has been merged and is pending for upload. I > > > wonder > > > what should be done to existing packages which requires a unnecessary > > > higher > > > version of libc6. > > > > That will warrant a rebuild of the affected packages. > > > > Let's ask Aurelien what he thinks! > > I do not really see what a rebuild would bring. That will indeed lower > the dependency, but the current dependency is already satisfied in > forky, and there is no trixie for loong64. > > Anyway that's a decision for the release team, putting them in the loop.
Sorry for the delay. As this effectly does not change anything, I don't think we need those rebuilds. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
