Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> (2024-12-31): > On 2024-12-26 22:52:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I'd like to get a sense of whether the following situation on riscv64 is > > just pure bad luck or if that's something that we should expect to run > > into in a regular fashion: > > > > 1: gcc-14 (11d 11h 30m, rv-manda-02), graph-tool (4d 19h 33m, > > rv-osuosl-03), gcc-snapshot (4d 15h 1m, rv-osuosl-04), kicad (11h 8m, > > rv-manda-01), mpich (7h 14m, rv-manda-04), pyside6 (5h 26m, rv-manda-03), > > freecad (5h 9m, rv-osuosl-05), jpeg-xl (4h 19m, rv-osuosl-02) > > To some extent this is bad luck with uploads of packages that take a > long time to build. From my experience with the last couple of > transitions, riscv64 was reasonable fast to work though the rebuilds. > > Also https://buildd.debian.org/stats/riscv64.png suggests that the > backlog is usually not too bad. Note that the current peak of packages > in Needs-Build is due to low priority rebuilds of hundreds of packages > with outdated Built-Using.
Copy all, thank you. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
