Hi, I'd like to get a sense of whether the following situation on riscv64 is just pure bad luck or if that's something that we should expect to run into in a regular fashion:
1: gcc-14 (11d 11h 30m, rv-manda-02), graph-tool (4d 19h 33m,
rv-osuosl-03), gcc-snapshot (4d 15h 1m, rv-osuosl-04), kicad (11h 8m,
rv-manda-01), mpich (7h 14m, rv-manda-04), pyside6 (5h 26m, rv-manda-03),
freecad (5h 9m, rv-osuosl-05), jpeg-xl (4h 19m, rv-osuosl-02)
A number of those packages take several-to-many days to build. The other
ones “only” take many hours instead.
I wouldn't usually worry about this too much, but it seems riscv64
became a full release architecture in the meanwhile (even if I don't
recall seeing any announcement), and missing builds block migration…
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/commit/593e01d703966ba8602eeff7594b0553900ea84f
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
