Hi On 2024-12-26 22:52:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'd like to get a sense of whether the following situation on riscv64 is > just pure bad luck or if that's something that we should expect to run > into in a regular fashion: > > 1: gcc-14 (11d 11h 30m, rv-manda-02), graph-tool (4d 19h 33m, > rv-osuosl-03), gcc-snapshot (4d 15h 1m, rv-osuosl-04), kicad (11h 8m, > rv-manda-01), mpich (7h 14m, rv-manda-04), pyside6 (5h 26m, rv-manda-03), > freecad (5h 9m, rv-osuosl-05), jpeg-xl (4h 19m, rv-osuosl-02)
To some extent this is bad luck with uploads of packages that take a long time to build. From my experience with the last couple of transitions, riscv64 was reasonable fast to work though the rebuilds. Also https://buildd.debian.org/stats/riscv64.png suggests that the backlog is usually not too bad. Note that the current peak of packages in Needs-Build is due to low priority rebuilds of hundreds of packages with outdated Built-Using. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
