-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Clinging to sanity, Xan mumbled in his beard:
> 1) I think that the democratical election of codenames is essential Why? A hypothetical Debian stinky will run exactly the same as a hypotetical Debian potatoe will. There's no technical reason for chosing the one or the other. > If this transparency implies to admit that "the > codenames are choosen randomilly/arbitrarily by release manager", I think > that it we/you have to admit this. The first think you were hearing here was 'the RM choses the codename'. I believe this is very transparent. Possibly it is even mentioned on the web site. I'm sure if you use google for 'debian codename', you will find the last 300 discussions about that topic. > It could be the difference between Debian and other (comercial) distros > that the decission are choosen uniterally (by the cupola). Debian is not a democracy. Debian is a volounteer organisation. The essential difference is: in a democracy, everybody can directly influence the decision. In Debian, the person who does something can tell how he does it (in most cases - and within the limit of the Social Contract, the DFSG and similar documents). ajt is release manager, he does the release, so he decides how he calls it. > 3) With high probability this post and mail will be ignored or will answered > with irony (or worst: with false wish of collaboration), but I do it at least > for point out it. Why so gloomy? You received honest, non-ironical answers the first time round. You will receive the same answers now. I agree, however, that suggesting the same thing multiple times, without providing new arguments, will increase the probability that you are being made fun of, or just ignored. (And, btw, I doubt cc:ing ajt will make any difference at all). friendly - -- vbi - -- Todo artista es tan múltiple que el crítico no puede dejar de encontrar en él lo que busca resueltamente y a priori. -- André Maurois. (1885-1967) Biógrafo, novelista y ensayista francés. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481 iKcEARECAGcFAkAC9WVgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJEIukMYvlp/fWvCUAnjoZgSWf8rsGPfh2pxhTmA5F M9dSAKCtvbiOtBYwL7lyzBhcVzTr2xKb4A== =jQL8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----