On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 07:31:02PM +0100, Xan wrote: > > 1) I think that the democratical election of codenames is essential and it
You're mad. Debian users and developers have far better ways to waste their time. > Anyway, I think that the trasparency of "why" this or another codename is > choosen is essential. If this transparency implies to admit that "the > codenames are choosen randomilly/arbitrarily by release manager", I think > that it we/you have to admit this. That is exactly what they are. And to an extent Debian releases are arbitraty in themselves. > 3) With high probability this post and mail will be ignored or will answered > with irony (or worst: with false wish of collaboration), but I do it at least > for point out it. You're mad. And you've got way too much time on your hands. Try squashing some RC bugs. -- Paul
