Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 04:07:07PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 18/02/12 at 15:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I do not want to push against Lenny data inside UDD. I just want to
> > bring up the topic because I realised that the UDD hosting machine is
> > not as powerfull as sometimes needed and we are starting to include more
> > derivatives than just Ubuntu. So it might make sense to consider droping
> > Lenny data after having dropped security support for this release.
>
> I agree.
OK. Any volunteer to adopt config-org.yaml accordingly and remove the
data from UDD?
> > When thinking about Lenny and stable I was wondering if we could reduce
> > the work load of importing data when checking whether an import is really
> > necessary. I did so for the ddtp importer which maintains a list of
> > sha1 sums of the files which should be imported. If the checksum of a
> > file did not changed the file to import is skipped. I guess the UDD
> > importer could profit from a similar approach.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I also agree, but don't have time to work on it currently. :)
OK, same for me. Any volunteer?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120218160421.gf20...@an3as.eu
