Hi, On 18/02/12 at 15:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I do not want to push against Lenny data inside UDD. I just want to > bring up the topic because I realised that the UDD hosting machine is > not as powerfull as sometimes needed and we are starting to include more > derivatives than just Ubuntu. So it might make sense to consider droping > Lenny data after having dropped security support for this release.
I agree. > When thinking about Lenny and stable I was wondering if we could reduce > the work load of importing data when checking whether an import is really > necessary. I did so for the ddtp importer which maintains a list of > sha1 sums of the files which should be imported. If the checksum of a > file did not changed the file to import is skipped. I guess the UDD > importer could profit from a similar approach. > > What do you think? I also agree, but don't have time to work on it currently. :) Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120218150707.ga30...@xanadu.blop.info
