Re: Lucas Nussbaum 2010-05-26 <20100526061354.gb9...@xanadu.blop.info> > > Maybe just reverting to prior state : if RFP before ITP, then revert to > > RFP, otherwise, if direct ITP, then close ... > > That would indeed be the solution that makes the most sense. The problem > is that "prior state" might be quite hard to determine.
Don't you need that anyway for determining if an ITA was an O or RFA? Re RFPs, inactive RFPs could just be handled the same. (After retitling from ITP to RFP, close it after N months of inactivity further.) Christoph -- c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
