Raphael Geissert <atomo64+deb...@gmail.com> writes: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Then how about sending a mail if one of the packages has (serious, >> certain) lintian errors? > Lintian currently still uses the EWI code when generating the report > which later udd imports. This file lacks the severity and certainty > information, which means it would be necessary to keep a local copy of > lintian in sync with lintian.d.o's version so that they both match. > Not impossible, but doesn't feel right. We can make available a better file, too. I've thought about that off and on, but never had time to figure out just what should be in the file. > I think I agree with zack; issues should be reported or the certainty > and severity tweaked. I think there's quite a bit that's wrong about the certainty right now. The severity I'm more confident about, but there are a bunch of certainty: certain tags with a bunch of overrides, which is clearly wrong. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
