On 21/02/09 at 19:39 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > @lucas: so, what information Andreas Tille wanted from DEHS in UDD? what do > you think about importing the data directly from pgsql? or do you really > prefer a text file?
I would prefer a text/yaml/json/whatever file so that file would act as a stable "API" (data exchange format) between DEHS and UDD. You would be able to completely break DEHS's DB without breaking this file. I don't like the idea of having DEHS SQL queries living in UDD. The format I would like is something like: distribution ; package ; debian version ; upstream version ; status (up-to-date, outdated, error, etc). Then, views could be added in UDD, like: "packages not up-to-date in unstable, without an up-to-date version in experimental." But if you think that another set of columns makes more sense, I'm fine with that, of course :-) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
