Hello, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Hello, > > I've finally devoted some time to prototype some tags about the > maintenance status of a package. Some discussion about this happened > at > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2007-September/001703.html > > What came out so far is this script, based on UDD: > http://git.debian.org/?p=debtags/autodebtag.git;a=blob;f=maint_tags > > An example of what it generates can be found at: > http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/maint.gz Nice :) > > While I was writing this, I was thinking: would it make sense to call > these tags qa::* instead of maint::*, and officially state that they are > the tags maintained by Debian QA? I don't expect anyone to object :) > Of course, I'd be happy to discuss ideas for new tags and for ways to > assign them to packages. The maint_tags script has a bit of > brainstorming in the comments at the end of the file. Once UDD gathers some information from DEHS it should be possible to generate tags like qa::new-upstream-version (with a proper/better name of course) for packages with a new upstream version that has been available for a while (6 months? less? more?). An example is curl, from[1]: Last time found up to date: 2008-08-27 04:51:08 @lucas: so, what information Andreas Tille wanted from DEHS in UDD? what do you think about importing the data directly from pgsql? or do you really prefer a text file? [1]http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/report.php?package=curl Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
