On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
While I was writing this, I was thinking: would it make sense to call
these tags qa::* instead of maint::*, and officially state that they are
the tags maintained by Debian QA?
I don't expect anyone to object :)
Neither do I.
@lucas: so, what information Andreas Tille wanted from DEHS in UDD?
Quote from http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2009/02/msg00027.html
I think two fields of information are needed:
boolean is_up_to_date
text upstream_version
If you think more information makes sense it is fine - but these
two fields are enough for the moment for my purpose.
what do
you think about importing the data directly from pgsql? or do you really
prefer a text file?
I thinks Lucas has the usual UDD gatheres in mind that obtain some text
files first and then are processing the information of these files and
store them in pgsql. I have no idea whather this makes sense in any case.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
