-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Schorpp wrote: | hi all, | | as i see you try to maintain quality in debian efficently. | | ive been thinking for months now about inventing and adopting | the SPI-standards cmm(x), spice, iso12207, and iso 9001, | etc, in free sw's lifecycles | and would like to ask you about comments and discussion. | | discussion/research points: | | 1. closing and improving the spi/qm/qa- cycle with the developers by | analyzing their dev-processes, tools, configuration/analysis mngmnt and | give non-demotivating feedback with | | -what i call now- "CMP" ( Capability Maturity Points), scale 10-100 | (log). | | the classic industry way has shown up to be demotivating, developers | would avoid the system or even trick it off. | | 2. escape the megawave of developer->feature->bug->developer bad cycles | by targeting q-lacks at the beginning of a lifecyle leaving no stage | uncovered, just building a dam against the bug-hazard at the end | and maintaining old waterfall structures has shown up no more | sufficent -UNDEPENDENTLY- of the size and amount of sw-project(s). | | 3. research, collect and provide "best practices", not just scales. |
4. invent software metrics for oss like function/class points. | . . . | | | | y | tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.3.90 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQYZVhmqsze5HSzyoAQKtkgQA44aifNr0YpgJLZb5j2GYX4MxHhIXoZlm y7lbavuAyRwU1xMImGsIhZGdxdRXoIQ5HTu23pwmODxM+/SKIgjRasxFxPbULh5i fSyrX9nAY2fgFkVSM/daH/M4SMObKZsda6U0RG15rCEhHxaCMjcpooh4kg6Xyhrz kb01U9XMN2E= =DKdY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
