On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:01:58PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-27 10:40]: > > It could be that mindi does not really need to depend on mindi-kernel > > but only on a kernel which has certain features (which an ordinary > > kernel-image-* probably has), in which case the "obviously right thing > > to do" would be to remove the undesired dependency. > > Are you volunteering to check whether this is the case? (Plus, are you > going to adopt mindi and mondo since their maintainer seem inactive.) >
Mondo is really a useful package for me. I can help/co-maintain/maintain in descending order of preference. -- Francesco P. Lovergine
