* Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-27 17:31]: > No. I was just pointing out that removing package B on which package A > depends does not make it necessarily "obvious" (as you said) that > package A has to be removed as well.
Yeah, okay, s/obvious/easy/ (solution) then. > Consider for example the latex2html case, where nobody claimed as > "obvious" that packages having a build-depends on latex2html should > be moved automatically to non-free. Well, that's obviously [:-)] a different situation. ;-) -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
