On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:

> * Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-16 16:46]:
> > Mindi depends on mindi-kernel, which had to be removed for license reasons.
> > (See bug 227757.)  QA, what do you think of removing mindi from unstable
> > as well?  It seems correct to me.  (In that case, please have someone James
>
> Yes, it's obviously the right thing to do.  mondo has to be removed as
> well since it depends on mindi.

It's not so "obvious".

It could be that mindi does not really need to depend on mindi-kernel
but only on a kernel which has certain features (which an ordinary
kernel-image-* probably has), in which case the "obviously right thing
to do" would be to remove the undesired dependency.

Reply via email to