On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-16 16:46]: > > Mindi depends on mindi-kernel, which had to be removed for license reasons. > > (See bug 227757.) QA, what do you think of removing mindi from unstable > > as well? It seems correct to me. (In that case, please have someone James > > Yes, it's obviously the right thing to do. mondo has to be removed as > well since it depends on mindi.
It's not so "obvious". It could be that mindi does not really need to depend on mindi-kernel but only on a kernel which has certain features (which an ordinary kernel-image-* probably has), in which case the "obviously right thing to do" would be to remove the undesired dependency.