On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:11:18PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> How's progress on this bug? Do you need any more help?
I've started to work on this, asking help on various channels when
needed. I've replaced the form() and vform() with code that compiles,
but I hit other problems so I could not test yet.
This is near the top of my todo-list, but I lack time, and my lack of
recent practical experience of C++ makes the task tedious and long.
> At the moment, the version of xdelta2 in testing depends on libdb3++,
> which has been removed in unstable in favour of libdb3++c102. As a
> result, db3 is blocked from progressing into testing until a fixed
> xdelta2 is available; this isn't solely responsible for holding up too
> much else just yet, but it probably will be soon (libsigc++ and
> jack-audio-connection-kit being the main things I've noticed so far).
Hm, I had not payed attention to this point. This raises the priority
of the item :|
> If it's going to be a while until a fixed xdelta2 is available, then
> perhaps we should temporarily drop xdelta2 from testing and let it back
> in once it's fixed. Anthony, what do you think?
There are a couple of RC bugs on xdelta2 anyway, and they affect
testing as well, so it is possible to drop it from testing I guess.
But I'd definitely appreciate any help :)
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
