We've all heard that the bug count in Debian is rising... some may
have argued that this is because we have an increasing number of
packages in the archive.  I just looked at the data from over 2 years
of packages in the base system.  The definition of "base system"
changes as some packages get removed while others are added (ae being
an example of a package which was removed at some point).  That's why
I looked at 83 important packages (see attachment) whose status has
not changed.  And the result is depressing... see for yourself:
http://bugs.debian.org/~tbm/base_bugs.png

I think we should promote co-maintainers for important packages and
try to get people to submit patches for open bugs to help the
maintainers.  (No news here, but we should *really* do it now.  Yes, I
mean really.)

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt
at
base-files
base-passwd
bash
bsdmainutils
bsdutils
console-common
console-data
console-tools
console-tools-libs
cpio
cron
debconf
debianutils
diff
dpkg
e2fsprogs
ed
exim
fileutils
findutils
gettext-base
grep
gzip
hostname
ifupdown
info
ipchains
klogd
libc6
libdb2
libident
libldap2
libncurses5
libnewt0
libpam0g
libpam-modules
libpam-runtime
libpcre3
libpopt0
libreadline4
libsasl7
libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
libwrap0
lilo
login
logrotate
mailx
makedev
man-db
manpages
mawk
mbr
modconf
modutils
mount
nano
ncurses-base
ncurses-bin
netbase
netkit-inetd
netkit-ping
net-tools
nvi
passwd
perl-base
ppp
procps
sed
sel
setserial
shellutils
slang1
sysklogd
syslinux
sysvinit
tar
tcpd
telnet
textutils
util-linux
whiptail

Reply via email to