On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:48:59AM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:21:35PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote: > > os << std::setbase(16) << 132; > > Ah OK, I was also pointed to: > > os << std::setw(4) << std::hex << 132 << std::dec; > > Unfortunately, that will make the code much longer and much less > readable. And there are also uses of ostrstream::vform(), to apply a > format passed by argument to other arguments. I guess I'll have to > fallback to vsnprintf() for this, with either the inherent problems of > string-length management. > > And I thought C++ was a high-level language :(
How's progress on this bug? Do you need any more help? At the moment, the version of xdelta2 in testing depends on libdb3++, which has been removed in unstable in favour of libdb3++c102. As a result, db3 is blocked from progressing into testing until a fixed xdelta2 is available; this isn't solely responsible for holding up too much else just yet, but it probably will be soon (libsigc++ and jack-audio-connection-kit being the main things I've noticed so far). If it's going to be a while until a fixed xdelta2 is available, then perhaps we should temporarily drop xdelta2 from testing and let it back in once it's fixed. Anthony, what do you think? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
