On Sat, Apr 24, 1999 at 05:23:16PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > > even get to read the message (when you don't read debian-devel for 10 > > > > days you surely won't notice one message among others). We must > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > I think that's not true. Is this is the case for you, then you should > setup some filters for keeping -devel in a separate folder. ;-)
As a matter of fact, I know how to separate the mail in folders (and do that with some lists), but I still do keep some Debian lists together with personal mail. That is just because it is more convenient for me. But I will never ever miss any messages sent directly to me since the MUA marks them differently. But some MUAs aren't that smart and people can miss it. > > I don't see whay intent to NMU is neccessary to be sent to -qa, but okay. > > I said that because I thought that you wanted to use -devel for > coordination and for informing about possible NMUs. Well, I didn't want that. > Of course, I do > not see the need of posting to -qa but it may be good so that > others are informed on what you do and so that you have a public statement > in which the date can be verified. ;-) ACK. > > I still think that the maintainer should have more time to say anything. > > Well, the number could be 20 days... > > Okay, 20 days is 3 weeks. That's long enough. If a maintainer does not > read his email during 3 weeks, he will be lost even with the > volume of -private. :-) Although -private is not a really good example these days ;( I know what you mean, and agree. It's now 20 days. -- enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
