On Sat, Apr 24, 1999 at 02:24:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > * Not so important package - [[things which aren't pri: Standard or > > above --aj]] > > By this definition, anacron fits into this. Or, at least it did while it > was orphaned. > > What packages currently maintained by -qa should be withdrawn? If none, > do we particularly want to withdraw any, or should we just more or less > let -qa handle all of them until they're unhappy.
I think that we the current situation is okay, we take enough care for most orphaned packages (at least those that we know they *are* orphaned). Maybe I should loosen the wording of that section... The bigger problem is reassigning all those long-orphaned packages to QA Group, and getting them in shape. I'll ask netgod (WNPP) to send us the newest list of his, so we can make a TODO list. -- enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
