> > In my new version of the fvwm package (2.2-x), there have been radical
> > changes. The postinst will do its best not to irrevocably retrieve
> > the information it expects to currently be present, but it warns the
> > installer that certain information may be lost, thus giving them a
> > chance to rescue it first. I do not think that this is an
> > unreasonable query, but better ways of handling it are always welcome.
>
> Please ensure that the user is not bothered if he makes a new installation
> such as a fresh slink/potato installation but only sees this message
> when upgrading from a proper older version to the current one.
Have done.
> > A more questionable example: "Should I make this the default window
> > manager?" We could always do so be default, but since the sysadmin
> > may have already chosed the default window manager, they may not like
> > this behaviour.
>
> Something has to be done here. I'm not sure what. But being asked
> everytime I install any wm, that sucks.
I totally agree. I too don't know what, though.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-*- Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP public key. -*-
