Quoting Alexandre Detiste (2025-08-23 09:42:20) > Yes, of course it's a mistake on my part; I 100% agree, > and my query/vision was a bit blurred before I could filter out all > the 1000 Haskell packages. > I was relying on DebianCodeSearch but could not find anything involved > with -udeb. > > But still from now it would be easier and less time consuming > to fix these two very last -udeb producers (the impact is not yet known) > than to go back and forth and rebuild cdbs and rebuild the packages again. > (I can port the font package)
I disagree. fonts-noto is currently effectively release-critically broken in stable. Solving that by refactoring fonts-noto packaging is more risky than reviving the already battle-tested bits that was dropped from cdbs. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature