On 03/05/2017 01:13 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On March 4, 2017 6:41:13 PM EST, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: >> On 03/04/2017 06:03 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> If you don't understand why, after repeated warnings, >>> you were temporarily banned from team repository access, >> >> I understand, but I don't agree. My view is that it went a way too far >> and that we all have better things to do than such playground activity. >> That's not how I envision team work either. >> >>> it probably is better that you refrain from contributing >>> to the team. >> >> Looks like you didn't even care reading what I wrote before replying. >> Otherwise you would know that's what I've been doing already, and one >> of >> the reasons I'm not comfortable moving packages to the team. > > My preference would be that you constructively contribute to the team. > I can understand your feelings, but I'd ask you to try and set them aside. > > It probably sounds like I'm telling you to go away. I'm not. > > If you can manage to move on from what happened before and work as part > of the team, I think we'll all be better off. Having pkg-openstack be > an alternative DPMT isn't a good approach. > > For things that aren't used outside openstack, I think it's great to > have a focused team. The other things would be better in DPMT and I > don't think you should block that where others want to do it. > > Scott K
Scott, It feels a way better to read what you just wrote. However, I am now confused (to say the least), because you wrote one thing and its complete opposite yesterday and today. From your words: "it probably is better that you refrain from contributing to the team." and right now: "My preference would be that you constructively contribute to the team." Which of the 2 sentences should I take into account? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
