On 03/05/2017 01:44 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Sunday, March 05, 2017 01:26:19 AM Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 03/04/2017 04:04 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> This was not about isolated mistakes. >>> [...] >>> I do not, however, think it's useful to rehash the details. >> >> Though that's what you're doing. >> >> You don't have a reason to do so, while I do (ie: explain why I would >> prefer if packages were not moved to the team). And you're here just >> proving me right. >> >>> I do think it is worth mentioning that since he's back in the team >>> it wasn't without limit. >> >> It's unbelievable to read this. None of the admins accepted to tell what >> would be the limit. Vincent explain how I have been re-added. Hopefully, >> you're only having difficulties to remember rather than being completely >> dishonest here. >> >> Conclusion of this little thread with Scott: I am right to continue to >> distrust this team's admins. I would advise anyone who don't know the >> team for so long to also be very careful as well. >> >> That's *not* hilarious, and I'm not amused, > > I wasn't at Debconf, so whatever happened there, I wasn't a part of it.
That's not what I just wrote about. I wrote about the fact that, when you guys decided to ban me, you - and I mean plural you, the admins - refused to say for how long. > All I > know is I was asked to consider re-adding you by one of the other admins and > we agreed to it. > > As far as the rest, we've never even (that I recall/know of) ever discussed > banning anyone else. This is absolutely not something anyone needs to worry > about and I'd appreciate you knock off the FUD. > > Scott K If you guys banned me once, in a way that I considered not proportionate to the miscommunication I did, what assurance do I have that it wont happen again? I do have the real concern that, if more packages are moved to the DPMT, I may loose access to them, making it impossible to package OpenStack in a normal way. That's no FUD. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
