On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 04:46:09PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dimanche 28 février 2010 à 15:29 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit : > > It would be far easier to let Python 2.6 be the default, then file (or > > upgrade) serious bugs and solve them in a week or two. > > Yeah sure, let’s knowingly break dozens of packages by switching instead > of fixing them before and make it painless for users.
I think we need to do both before we end up running out of time. I propose that we upgrade/file bugs as serious so that they get maintainer attention where possible, and allow (let's say) 7 days to react. After this time, Python 2.6 should become default in sid and all such bugs are NMU candidates. If nothing else gets maintainer's attention, this will. -- Jonathan Wiltshire 1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100228161932.ga32...@lupin.powdarrmonkey.net
