OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du samedi 27 février 2010, vers 20:19, Luca Falavigna <dktrkr...@debian.org> disait :
> after some discussions on #debian-python, I'd like to propose > increasing severity of Python 2.6 related bugs [1] to serious. Well, I disagree. Python 2.6 is not the default. Packages are currently built with Python 2.5 and do not fail to build in a current pbuilder. We already had a bunch of bug reports about packages not building with Python 2.6 as default a few months ago and it was a mess to setup a pbuilder to build with Python 2.6 as default [1]. The solution is easier now but not documented (to the best of my knowledge). I am also still lost why Python transition communication is done in debian-release@ and not in debian-pyt...@. debian-python@ contains posts like "Why default python is not 2.6 yet?" that got not really answered because the transition seems to be managed behind the scene. It would be far easier to let Python 2.6 be the default, then file (or upgrade) serious bugs and solve them in a week or two. Most bug FTBFS reports that I received for my Python packages is related to the build process and does not hinder the package from working with Python 2.6. I think this is the case for most simple packages because the hard work is done by python-support. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557925 -- BOFH excuse #447: According to Microsoft, it's by design
pgprTOxLyrbZl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
