On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 01:40:34PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > Posting draft team missions where one has to read between the lines > about possible institutional conflicts and other unsaid issues, is > emphatically /NOT/ a way to build trust within the project.
To make it clear: I think the draft team mission that was posted is a great start for a discussion, and I think we need teams to support people in Debian, and I think we need a good way to escalate different interpretation of the CoC. What I think is not a way to build trust, is what Guillerme's reading of Tina's message was implying. I think those things hurt everyone and destroy good efforts, and I strongly wanted to push the discussion back to the idea of constucting something together. I see how my message could be read as implying that the whole draft Steve posted is not a good way to build trust. To the contrary, I consider it a good way to put cards on the table, and to start to work out together how they should be arranged. I was afraid I was hearing that some cards might not be kept on the table, and I wanted to strongly object to that. If all the cards are on the table, by all means, let's all find a good way to put them together! Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enr...@enricozini.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
