Hello Martina, On Fri 11 Oct 2019 at 04:56AM +01, Martina Ferrari wrote:
> On 10/10/2019 10:16, Enrico Zini wrote: >> I suggest to review your notes with the idea that there could be two >> or more such teams in Debian posting the same set of notes, and they >> shouldn't conflict. > > I don't think that would be a good use of anybody's time. The CT wants > to be *the* team doing the proposed job, and it would be kind of silly > to have two teams doing the exact same thing. If there is another team > that the project feels more fit for the job, then the CT should disband. I don't think Enrico is suggesting that there actually be two teams. I could be wrong, but I think his point was that unless you're seeking a delegation, it would useful to imagine that there *could* be another team, while reviewing your own proposals. That way, you can ensure that they really are reasonable proposals for a non-delegated entity. On Fri 11 Oct 2019 at 07:27AM -04, Sam Hartman wrote: > If you're going down the delegation path, it is good to decide that > early. That way we know that the project feedback matters in a > different way than if it is a non-delegated entity just soliciting > feedback on how they can be useful. Right. I believe that Enrico's suggestion, quoted above, applies to the case in which a non-delegated entity is seeking feedback. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
