On 9/4/14, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote:
> On 9/4/14, Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>> Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Code of Conduct violations handling process"):
>>> What case? Ian raised a bunch of general questions about how we plan on
>>> enforcing our CoC, with no reference to any specific incident. You seem
>>> to be convinced that this is about some specific incident and, further,
>>> about forcing some specific action about that specific incident, but so
>>> far as I can tell, this belief on your part is not based on anything
>>> that's been said in this mailing list.
>>
>> It would be disingenous of me to say that my message isn't prompted
>> by a specific incident. For obvious reasons I haven't explained what
>> that incident is. I'm assuming that Russ hasn't seen my other message
>> about this, on another forum.
>
> This in fact is, in my extremely high opnion, a classic example
> of the tyranny of the COC! Everyone in this thread has been SO
> "PC", no one dares post the link, or even name the even so that
That should have been "name the event".
But I replied for another reason - I personally have no idea what
the event is, how to find it, what it entails, why it was/is/could
possibly be considered as, offensive, and so *my* contribution
to this discussion is likely a percentage point below 100 due to
my lack of data.
But has that data been provided?
NO! I am not treated like an adult.
I am treated like an ignorant delicate ----!
But at least we are abiding the COC.
Do not ignore the COC - it swingeth proud.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAOsGNSQQM7+CqNo4GbYK373ZyBNpGGJVzfKKqaR=7j_igdm...@mail.gmail.com
