Hi. Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> writes:
>> >> <http://packages.qa.debian.org/cdbs#project> >> schema:contributor [ >> a foaf:Agent ; >> foaf:name "Jonas Smedegaard" ; >> foaf:account [ >> a foaf:OnlineAccount ; >> foaf:accountServiceHomepage >> <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@jones.dk> ; >> owl:sameAs >> <http://webid.debian.net/maintainers/dr%40jones.dk#account> >> ] ; >> owl:sameAs <http://webid.debian.net/maintainers/dr%40jones.dk#agent> >> ] ; > > Looks almost correct now - with the exception of my original key point: > You still declare above that the Agent by name "Jonas Smedegaard" is an > account. > Well, no. I'm saying that the Agent named "Jonas Smedegaard" *has* an account. foaf:account is the replacing foaf:holdsAccount, it seems (see http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_holdsAccount). > I believe changing line 5 to foaf:holdsAccount makes it semanticly > correct. > > >> Note that compared to your example, I've put a foaf:name instead of >> the account's accountName (which, in webid.debian.net, is the email). > > Well, an accountName is a unique identifier, whereas a name is not. > Hence, the unicity, on webid.debian.net of the foaf:accountName of the OnlineAccounts (since it is the email) whereas the foaf:name of the Agent allows homonymy. So I hope these RDF representations will semantically correct now. Tell me if I've overlooked details and made a mistake. Best regards, P.S.: there's apparently a bug in that <http://webid.debian.net/maintainers/dr%40jones.dk#agent>'s foaf:firstName is 'Maintainer:' :-/ ... will see if I can spot the culprit perl code ;) -- Olivier BERGER http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fw0po27q....@inf-8657.int-evry.fr
