Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> writes: > Quoting Olivier Berger (2013-02-13 23:01:27) >> > Oh, and I forgot that I had added to >> > http://people.debian.org/~obergix/ a link (<link rel="meta" >> > type="application/rdf+xml" title="FOAF" ...) to my "Debian FOAF >> > profile" : <http://people.debian.org/~obergix/foaf.rdf> > > In your personal foaf.ttl file you state that not you but your Debian > account is contributor to your packages. That seems wrong to me. >
Well... that's the way I've implemented the RDF spit by the PTS, so far. For example (excerpt from http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cdbs.ttl): <http://packages.qa.debian.org/cdbs#project> doap:name "Debian cdbs packaging" ; doap:description "Maintenance of the cdbs source package in Debian" ; doap:homepage <http://packages.debian.org/src:cdbs> ; doap:homepage <http://packages.qa.debian.org/cdbs> ; schema:contributor [ a foaf:OnlineAccount ; foaf:accountName "Jonas Smedegaard" ; foaf:accountServiceHomepage <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@jones.dk> ] ; a admssw:SoftwareProject . The OnlineAccount blank node being ready to be replaced by <http://webid.debian.net/maintainers/js#account> any time soon. Thus I'm able to distinguish those you upload as d...@jones.dk from those as j...@debian.org : 2 distinct OnlineAccount resources who may happen to belong (foaf:account) to the same Person <http://webid.debian.net/maintainers/js>. Btw, I had just added that too to webid.debian.net : <http://webid.debian.net/maintainers/8fb5238859d200bb4e1de91964c58d779f04a913#agent> foaf:account <http://webid.debian.net/maintainers/8fb5238859d200bb4e1de91964c58d779f04a913#account> ; a foaf:Person . <http://webid.debian.net/maintainers/8fb5238859d200bb4e1de91964c58d779f04a913#account> a foaf:OnlineAccount . My idea (already mentioned in the thread I think) is to distinguish contributions made by the same person but under different hats, for instance as an employee or a hobbyist. This philosophic distinction between Person and OnlineAccount may be nitpicking, but on the other hand, as Debian doesn't enforce the use of a unique email for all of one person's contributions, I preferred to model in such a way... It could be collapsed but we may loose some information... I guess it would make things easier for implementors to have less links to explore... but there ain't much complains yet ;) Thanks for your feedback. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zjz5siq6....@inf-8657.int-evry.fr
