Bernd Zeimetz dijo [Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 02:54:17PM +0200]: > > If there are too many emails, maybe you should reduce the number of > > emails by reducing the number of questions asked? > > No. > The number of emails rises only if candidates don't answer in a useful way and > the AM needs to ask back. Otherwise the number of emails is more than low > enough. Looking at the last good mbox there're 7 mails to read as all the > questions were answered perfectly. And this is what one should expect as the > questions are definitely not hard.
As an AM, I actually prefer it the other way around - Of course, I do not have a FD or DAM hat to wear. But if my applicant's answers are not _completely_ satisfactory, I first ask him to elaborate further. And after a round or two, I end up explaining what I know about the fact. And he usually mails back with some comments regarding my explanation. Yes, I have only processed a single applicant so far, and with ~80 mails, I think some people might hate me - but I prefer to be that verbose on my AM communications. -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
