Le Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 08:13:22AM -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit : > > But all of that said, it still needs trusted people to review the > packages, which is where we've traditionally started to have scaling > problems.
This is where a public peer-review has an advantage: when submitting and reviewing a package we are exposed to the reviews of others. People who make good reviews will build a reputation, and will be natural candidates if we want to maintain a team of trusted people who have the last word. And conversly, an open system lets people try the task and test their commitment before asking for a responsability. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
