Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>>> What you miss is that I move all problematic candidates to DAM with
>>> the comment "I'm not entirely happy, but its your job to decide..."
>> OK, then what I'm proposing is to identify one single entity where the
>> decision is taken. Either is FD or is DAM.
>
> It's DAM. DAM has always been the position that decides who is a DD and
> who isn't. The whole FD/NM thing is just an advisory board to the DAM
> if you want to call it that.
Exactly.FD checks for completeness officially.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
