On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote: > Assuming that the number of DEPs will be significant, I think it would > be a good idea to separate ACCEPTED DEPs into two groups, namely > "historical" which nobody needs to read, because their text is included > in some authorative document (policy, devref, whatever) and "current", > which may be useful to read because they aren't included anywhere (DEP0 > will probably stay there, for example).
So long as devref revisions don't go through a public discussion process on debian-policy or a similar general-audience list, I don't think inclusion in devref is a reason to treat DEPs as "historical". Otherwise, it seems reasonable to me. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
