This is obviously the bikeshed part of DEP0... On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:30:42PM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > Lars Wirzenius, Stefano Zacchiroli and myself are trying to introduce > > > the concept of Debian Enhancement Proposals, > > > > Well done! > > > > I have only one comment (for the moment): > > > Creating a DEP > > > -------------- > > > > > > The procedure to create a DEP is simple: send an e-mail to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], stating that you're taking the next > > > > I think the initial mail should be sended to debian-devel-announce > > because there might be a lot of interested people who do not read > > debian-project. At least I feel DEP0 should go initially to dda. > > debian-devel-announce is restricted to DD's do we want that for proposing > DEP's? > > On the other hand, finding a DD to forward a proposal would probably be easy > enough, so it doesn't matter that much
Personally, I think DEP should go to d-d-a *once accepted* (dunno about obsoleted, maybe as well), but initial drafts should go to either debian-devel (DEP touches development, I assume this will be the vast majority of DEPs, also the case for most examples from DEP0), or debian-project (DEP does not touch development, the `finding sponsorship' example from DEP0 and DEP0 itself). Otherwise, I think this is a good idea. Did you consider moving dep.d.n over to wiki.debian.org once that is run by ikiwiki and DEPs are common practise? cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
