On Thursday 29 November 2007, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I know, but maybe (but that's sad if we need to do that) we should > > have overrides validated by the QA people … *sigh*. > > Should the override file have a justification field for each (error) > override? That would help generic DD's going through all override > files.
override files allow comments which means giving a justification is already possible. So it seems this just needs to be documented as best practice? -- Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
