On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +0000, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation > > > type conclusions out of this, rather than just "foo sucks and > > > shouldn't upload" > > > > One thing we could do is have a seperate report on > > http://lintian.debian.org which lists all the lintian overrides (maybe > > only those for errors, not for warnings), so they can be peer reviewed > > by interested people. > > > > Another thing we could do is alert sponsors about checking for lintian > > overrides when they review a package. > > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make > lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and > install windows over your Debian if you override such errors.
Then tag as wontfix when someone reports the bug on lintian? Or just claim that it's a feature, not a bug? -- Brett Parker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
