On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:54:39PM +0000, Michael Banck wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make > > lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and > > install windows over your Debian if you override such errors. > > Are you routinely overriding valid lintian errors or why are you > apparently so deeply horrified by peer review of lintian overrides? > > Pierre, bugs are nothing to be ashamed of.
You must have misunderstood me. I believe that allowing anyone to override some kinds of lintian warnings should just be disallowed, because there's no way such a thing is correct. Or so seldomly that packagers for whom it's the case can live with a warning. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpvfWXmvbzWN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
