On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Gustavo Franco wrote: > >- more momentum to the leadership: clearly a single leader is swamped with > > administrivia and even the addition of a 2IC didn't let Anthony finish > > his first proposal (about giving single-package upload rights to some > > people which don't want to become full DD but want to maintain just one > > or two packages) > > Could you elaborate about the administrivia comment?
I already elaborated somewhere else in the thread. It's more that the DPL is probably too much sollicited (mediation, press, various CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) which let him not too many time to do the projects that he might have presented in his campaign. > >- better decision taking: when you have a big discussion, it's difficult > >to take a > > decison alone, you take the sole responsibility of it... whereas when > > you're 10 which are deciding, it's easier to assume the outcome. > > Which kind of decision? Technical? The kind of decision that you expect a DPL to take: decide if a new idea is worth trying, decide of some guidelines for internal teams, decision of new appointments, decide how to spend our money, ... > >It's also a form of leadership that fits better our own internal workings. > >If a board member goes MIA, we still have 9 others who are there. > > We've group examples that actually work this way and others that > simple don't work if one board member is MIA. That's all about how > much work from others one of the members can block. I don't see how someone can block the work of others in this particular case. Please be specific (or stop bringing out unrelated concerns). Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
