Hi, On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Romain Francoise wrote: > Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Feel free to comment, ask questions and give suggestions on how to > > enhance it. > > Could you provide a bit more context about which problems this would > solve, and why you think it's necessary?
It tries to give: - more momentum to the leadership: clearly a single leader is swamped with administrivia and even the addition of a 2IC didn't let Anthony finish his first proposal (about giving single-package upload rights to some people which don't want to become full DD but want to maintain just one or two packages) - better decision taking: when you have a big discussion, it's difficult to take a decison alone, you take the sole responsibility of it... whereas when you're 10 which are deciding, it's easier to assume the outcome. - better respect of the leadership: if you don't like the leader, it's easy to dismiss any of its decision, but if you have 6 people in the board that you respect and 4 that you don't trust too much, you're more likely to accept the outcome of a given decision. It's also a form of leadership that fits better our own internal workings. If a board member goes MIA, we still have 9 others who are there. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
