On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:26:53PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Except for firmware, where we're starting to have some good guidelines on > what's accepted by Debian, I'm not sure that those discussions are > completely part of the past.
You're right of course. But my point was more about us having no idea what will come. > > I do agree that we eventually should elect all members. But I would go > > one step further and give every one of these positions a special > > resposibility, e.g. community relations, marketing, internal > > organisation, ... and let them elect their chairman themselves. > > Interesting idea. I like the principle but I'm not sure that you'll have > many candidates for "internal organisation" when it's so more fun to > work on "public relation". But this needs to be thought further, it could > be an interesting base. Well, I would have guessed the other way round if you consider "internal organisation" to include our servers, network, etc. :-) Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
