Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 05:36:23PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I suppose it's possible this is how they were reading the "Dunc-Bank" >> QA effort to find RC bugs, but if so, I think they were misreading the >> spirit of that effort > I think that the first two sentences on http://dunc-bank.zoy.org/ have > any potential of being mis-read. Dunc-Bank looks like a desperate effort > to make the current dunc-tank experiment fail masquerading behind a > generally good idea. Thankfully, the web page makes it pretty clear what > dunc-bank's real objective is. I read it as humor, but possibly that's helped by seeing it when it was originally proposed and seeing people take it in a fairly light-hearted fashion. Plus, I really do appreciate the work that they're doing. They're not making up RC bugs; they're finding real problems that really do need to be fixed. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
