On 12/11/06, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Filipus Klutiero writes ("Re: Debian Weekly News - November 28th,
2006"):
> > DWN should be NPOV
>
> What nonsense. Debian is a political organisation, and all of us are
> engaged in politics as well as technology. Expecting us to be neutral
> is to miss the point completely.
I have to admit that I agree to Filipus, DWN should try to be as
neutral as it can. However, this requires an Editor that actively
adds items and maintains neutrality, while at the moment (dunc-tank,
yada yada, no funding etc.) DWN is solely contributor-based, so the
contributors decide what gets included.
Filipus, you're welcome to contribute. Send your items to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Joey
--
Life is too short to run proprietary software. -- Bdale Garbee
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello -
I read the following in the current DistroWatch Weekly:
"Andreas Barth has published a release update regarding the upcoming release
of Debian <http://distrowatch.com/debian> GNU/Linux 4.0. Although it does
not provide any information about the probable release date of the much
awaited Etch, it does hint at what many suspected was one of the reasons for
the current delay - the go slow strike of some of those Debian developers
who strongly objected to the Dunc-Tank experiment to fund the work of two
release managers with generous salaries..."
Is this correct - that some Debian developers are consciously and
deliberately slowing the release of "etch?"
- Sebastian
--
"...heart and soul....one will burn."
- Joy Division
