Drew Parsons writes ("Re: Position Statement to the Dunc-Tanc "experiment""):
> The first group, the minority, believes that any use of money to
> increase the time developers spend on Debian is always intrinsically a
> bad idea.This an oft-repeated straw-man characterisation of dunc-tank's opponents. It's completely unsupportable; if you read Joerg's statement, it explains what the signatories feel is different about dunc-tank. Would everybody please stop repeating the straw man. (My name isn't at the bottom of the position statement, even though I agree with it, because I was too slow to respond and also because I wasn't convinced that prolonging the discussion was the right thing to do given that the nay-sayers seem to have been comprehensively outvoted. However, I cannot let this persistent mischaracterisation of our views go unchallenged.) Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
